🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives buried in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion say that a lack of decision on how best to tackle the issue is creating unnecessary distress concerning the final resting places of their departed family.

An Impending Danger to Ancient Churchyards

Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being consumed by the sea in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation sets out a series of possible actions, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and reburying them in safer sites. Officials say it is for the community to determine how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. They intended this to serve as their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates suggest at least a portion of one graveyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Past

A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the sea, along with its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. Individuals will take bones as souvenirs and go grave robbing in search of treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that happened at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the shore. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Peril

Along the coast is situated the grave of a former paratrooper who died while serving abroad. His mother expressed she could not sleep after discovering her son’s final plot might one day be relocated.

“It does disturb me to consider this won’t be his lasting resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant site to visit.”

In her view, new interments should stop but says it is premature to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Seeking Solutions and Clarity

The lack of consensus over when and how to handle the problem has resulted in grieving relatives feeling exasperated and worried.

Several families want more sea defences to slow the unavoidable loss and to permit funerals to continue for now. Others argue the time for relocation is approaching.

“The situation is very emotive,” said one relative. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A local official confirmed the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with communities.”

He added there was ample time to consider all the options. “We are talking many years before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should be done yet. It requires productive community discussions to find the appropriate answers for each village.”

The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was described as one of “profound sadness for the area,” but faith leaders also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, offering a spiritual perspective on the temporal disappearance of hallowed earth.