🔗 Share this article

The nation's bold move to ban social networking access for individuals under sixteen is creating waves worldwide. Politicians, campaigners, and parents are observing with great interest to see if this approach will become a template for countries abroad.

Across Europe Movement

In Europe, a increasing chorus of nations are moving toward parallel bans.

• Denmark plans a ban on social media for under-15s, with the prime minister arguing that smartphones and platforms are "stealing our youngsters' youth". The policy could be formalized next year.
• Norway is set to introduce a minimum age limit of 15, citing the need to safeguard the young from the "influence of the AI".
• Ireland is working on a digital wallet to authenticate the user details of social media participants. Authorities have indicated that an Australia-style ban could be "an measures in reserve".
• In Spain, the prime minister has urged parliament to approve a bill lifting the legal age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has threatened a ban for children below 15, and a legislative committee has suggested a related step, alongside an overnight "screen time restriction" for older teenagers.
• The government in The Dutch government has urged guardians to restrict their children from social media until 15.

Across the European Union, the EU parliament has passed a non-binding statement demanding a ban for minors except if a parent decides otherwise is provided. Although it highlights of the "compulsive" quality of these apps, the move does not create enforceable legislation.

"A strong age restriction is a good foundation," commented the MEP supporting the resolution.

The United Kingdom: A Watchful Stance

Across Britain, the government has not ruled out a future ban, emphasizing that "no option is being dismissed" but maintaining any policy must be "based on strong evidence".

Previously, interest grew behind a proposal to impose restrictions on social media use by under-16s, but it was ultimately weakened. However, the government pledged to conduct more studies the issue.

Charities have expressed apprehensions. A prominent charity set up by the relatives of a young person who died after encountering dangerous online content argues that a blanket age ban could fail to make platforms safer and could lead to a "sudden drop-off" of risk when teens become eligible.

"The Australian ban is a response to the inability of the social media companies to create tools that are safe and suitable for children," stated a influential online safety campaigner.

America: A Fragmented Approach

Stateside, action is mostly occurring at the regional government level due to federal inaction.

• Utah requires adult approval for those under 18 to use social media and limits late-night use.
• Florida has signed a law prohibiting those below 14 from accessing social media, though it is entangled in legal challenges.
• Virginia has passed a rule capping minors to one hour of social media use per day, with any further use dependent on adult consent.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly passed measures demanding parental consent for teenagers to create social media presences.

Even with widespread concern and proposals from some figures to mimic Australia's path, a federal ban is currently seen as a distant prospect.

International Perspectives

Outside of the West, additional states are likewise taking action.

• Malaysia aims to prohibit social media for those under sixteen starting from next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has lifted the access age for Instagram to 16.

But, world agencies adopt a more measured stance. The UN children's agency has warned that social media bans pose dangers and "might have unintended consequences". The agency points out that online platforms can be a "critical link" for vulnerable children and that bans should not be a "replacement" for platform operators to prioritize user protection.

Even as this worldwide debate continues, the steps of this nation and others show that governments globally are no longer prepared to wait for platforms to make changes on their own.